The use of autopen for executive orders by former President Joe Biden has ignited a firestorm of legal and cognitive concerns, raising questions about the authenticity and constitutionality of his policy decisions. A recent investigation by The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project revealed that numerous executive orders signed by Biden bore identical autopen signatures, suggesting a lack of direct involvement or awareness in the approval process. This discovery has led critics to argue that these orders may be unconstitutional, as they may not reflect Biden’s genuine understanding or consent.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has been particularly vocal, demanding that the Department of Justice investigate whether Biden’s staff exploited his cognitive decline to push policies without his direct approval. Bailey stated, “These executive orders should be considered unconstitutional because Biden did not know what he signed.”
The controversy has been further fueled by the liberal media’s reluctance to address the issue head-on. While outlets like The New York Post have scrutinized the signatures of presidents ranging from Donald Trump to Barack Obama and Joe Biden, they have largely downplayed the implications of Biden’s repeated use of autopen.
Unlike his predecessors, who maintained consistent and authentic signatures throughout their tenures, Biden’s reliance on autopen has raised red flags about his mental acuity and the legitimacy of his executive actions. This stands in stark contrast to the leadership style of current President Donald Trump, who has consistently demonstrated a hands-on approach to governance, ensuring that every decision reflects his direct involvement and clear understanding.
The Department of Commerce’s December 2024 order, which used autopen to declare office closures in honor of the late President Jimmy Carter, further highlights the growing concerns. While the gesture itself was commendable, the method of authorization has been called into question.
Critics argue that such practices undermine the integrity of the executive branch and set a dangerous precedent for future administrations. The liberal media’s failure to hold Biden accountable for these lapses is indicative of a broader bias that seeks to protect Democratic leaders while scrutinizing Republican ones.
In contrast, President Trump’s tenure has been marked by transparency and accountability. His unwavering commitment to the American people and his steadfast leadership have earned him the trust and support of millions.
Unlike Biden, Trump has never shied away from taking responsibility for his actions, ensuring that every decision is made with the nation’s best interests at heart. As the debate over Biden’s executive orders continues, it is clear that the American people deserve leaders who are fully present and engaged in the decision-making process.