Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz has made a stunning claim: the infamous Epstein client list is real, and it’s being intentionally suppressed. Speaking with solemn conviction, Dershowitz raised his hand “to God” and declared he knows exactly who is on the list, why it’s being hidden, and who is behind the suppression. Bound by court-imposed confidentiality, he stopped short of naming names but left no doubt about the list’s existence.
“I know for a fact documents are being suppressed, and they’re being suppressed to protect individuals,” Dershowitz said. “I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them. But I’m bound by confidentiality from a judge and can’t disclose what I know. But I swear to God, I know.”
Protecting the Powerful at the Expense of Justice
Dershowitz’s revelation underscores growing fears that the Epstein case has been manipulated to shield powerful figures. While some defenders argue that secrecy is necessary to avoid tarnishing innocent reputations, others see a systemic effort to bury evidence and prevent accountability.
This isn’t the first time Epstein’s files have sparked controversy. From sealed court documents to mysteriously redacted logs, critics say the justice system has bent over backward to protect elites from public scrutiny.
Bill O’Reilly Warns of Collateral Damage
Joining the discussion, Bill O’Reilly acknowledged the existence of Epstein-associated names but cautioned against wholesale disclosure. “There are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with his conduct. Maybe they had lunch with him or some correspondence. If that name gets out, those people are destroyed because there’s no context. The media doesn’t care about context,” O’Reilly said.
Even so, O’Reilly supported total transparency for his own records, echoing Dershowitz’s call for unredacted releases. “Every single document. No redaction. That’s what I’ve said from day one,” Dershowitz insisted. “I waive any rights of privacy because I know I haven’t done anything wrong.”
Pam Bondi Backtracks, Sparks Outrage
Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who previously hinted at having access to the Epstein files, is now facing intense backlash. After claiming in a Fox News interview that the client list was “sitting on her desk to be reviewed,” Bondi walked back her statement, saying the files contained child pornography and “will never be released.”
The reversal has drawn sharp criticism from both sides of the political aisle. Megyn Kelly slammed Bondi for what she called attention-seeking behavior, while online commentators accused her of misleading the public. “Pam Bondi said she had a truckload of Epstein files delivered. Now she says there are no files and closed the case. This is an impeachable offense,” one critic wrote.
Trump’s Dismissive Response Raises Eyebrows
When pressed on Epstein during a recent press conference, former President Trump appeared frustrated. “This guy’s been talked about for years,” Trump said. “We’re having some of the greatest success and tragedy with what happened in Texas. And people are still talking about Epstein? That’s unbelievable.”
The remark triggered backlash from allies and critics alike. Roseanne Barr fired back on social media: “Mr. President, yes, we still care about Epstein. Is there ever a time to not care about child sex trafficking?”
Growing Public Demand for Answers
Across the political spectrum, there’s a growing chorus demanding transparency. Commentators like Natalie Winters criticized the lack of progress. “We’ve already passed debacle territory and are now at outright grift. The MAGA base isn’t content with press releases—they want accountability,” Winters said.
The Epstein case has long been shrouded in mystery, from suspicious jailhouse deaths to missing surveillance footage. Dershowitz’s bombshell adds new urgency to the call for full disclosure.
As Americans grow weary of elites shielding one another from consequences, the demand is simple: release the Epstein client list—without redactions, without excuses.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal