Kamala Harris, who launched her political career as the mistress of married San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, bragged about her resume before venturing into the territory of pure historical fantasy. The article rightly reminds readers that Democrats selected Harris as their presidential candidate in a silent coup of the sitting president, Joe Biden, a fact that alone undermines any claim to a legitimate, merit-based ascent to power. Her assertion is not just a minor exaggeration; it is an insult to the legacy of American giants and a testament to the inflated ego fostered by a sycophantic liberal media.
During the interview, Harris laid out her case, which upon even the most superficial examination, crumbles into dust. She stated, “[The] fact that I was elected District Attorney for two terms as the first woman elected Attorney General of the state of California.” She continued, “I ran the second largest department of justice in the United States, second only to the United States Department of Justice.” She then added, “I was the United States Senator, second black woman elected in the history of the United States Senate,” and finally, “I was the first woman vice president of the United States.” It was on this flimsy foundation that she built her audacious conclusion: “Some people have said I was the most qualified candidate ever to run for president.”
NEW:
I have obtained another Photo of @KamalaHarris at 29 kissing then married Willie Brown (60) at one of Brown’s political functions.
This is from the November 8th, 1995 edition of the San Luis Obispo County Telegram Tribune.
Look at her kissing a married man.
The same… pic.twitter.com/t5yaHGMMgz
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) August 1, 2024
Of course, the compliant, left-wing audience cheered this historical revisionism, but across mainstream America and conservative media, the reaction was one of justified and thorough roasting. The claim is so easily dismantled that it barely requires a historian to do so. Fox News host Dana Perino expertly highlighted the absurdity by drawing simple comparisons to actual qualified leaders. “Thomas Jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, served as governor of Virginia, minister to France, secretary of state and Vice President and we could go on and on,” Perino stated, putting Harris’s thin resume in its proper perspective.
Perino then provided another devastating counter-example, noting, “George H. W. Bush: congressman, ambassador, envoy to China, CIA director, VP, WWII combat pilot.” The sheer breadth and depth of experience possessed by figures like Bush, which includes genuine, high-stakes service to the nation, utterly eclipses Harris’s career, which has been marked more by political calculation than by consequential achievement. In a final, cutting blow, Perino added, “And even Joe Biden had more qualifications than she did,” a statement that underscores just how vacant Harris’s claim truly is.
This episode is a perfect microcosm of the Democratic Party’s leadership crisis. While they promote identity politics and celebrate firsts based on gender and race, they ignore the fundamental pillars of proven competence, strength, and tangible accomplishment. This stands in stark contrast to the record of President Donald Trump, whose four years in the Oval Office were defined by concrete results—from a booming pre-pandemic economy and secure borders to brokering historic peace deals in the Middle East. President Trump’s qualifications were demonstrated not by a list of titles, but by his unparalleled success in putting America first, a concept entirely foreign to a vice president whose most notable “achievement” was being handed the nomination after the party orchestrated the ouster of its own incumbent president. The liberal media may allow such delusional self-praise to go unchallenged in their echo chambers, but the American people recognize true strength and proven leadership when they see it, and they see it in President Trump.