It’s not every day that you see a grown man, who’s supposedly in a position of leadership, flop like a fish out of water on national television. But that’s exactly what NCAA President Charlie Baker did when Senator John Kennedy put him in the hot seat over the NCAA’s insane policy of allowing biological men to compete in women’s sports.
This was no ordinary grilling. It was a complete takedown. Senator Kennedy’s line of questioning was simple, direct, and, frankly, common sense. Do biological males have an advantage over biological females in sports? Any rational person—with or without a Ph.D. in biology—knows the answer is a resounding YES. It’s not rocket science, folks. Men are, on average, stronger, faster, and more physically equipped to compete in sports. But when Kennedy put this question to Baker, you’d think he’d just asked him to solve world peace.
After some awkward dodging, Baker finally admitted the truth: Yes, biological males do have an advantage. So, what’s the NCAA’s excuse for allowing men to compete against women? Well, according to Baker, it’s the federal courts’ fault. That’s right—he’s blaming “the courts” for his spineless refusal to stand up for fairness in women’s sports. He claims that five federal judges have “sided with participation” and that this “current dynamic” leaves the NCAA’s hands tied.
Are You Kidding Me, Charlie?
Baker’s “we’re just following orders” routine is the most pathetic excuse for “leadership” imaginable. His whole job as the president of the NCAA is to ensure fair competition in collegiate sports. If the NCAA’s own president can’t stand up for fairness, then what exactly is he getting paid for? Oh, and let’s not forget—Baker’s predecessor was pulling in a $2.8 million salary, so it’s safe to assume Baker’s not exactly working for minimum wage.
Spineless and Shameless
Senator Kennedy’s frustration was palpable, and rightfully so. He even called out Baker directly, saying, “Why don’t you go to Amazon, buy a spine online, and take a stand?” If there’s a line that sums up Baker’s entire performance, it’s that. He’s got no spine, no standards, and no sense.
Instead of leading, Baker is hiding behind “federal guidance” and “legal constraints.” But here’s the kicker—the NCAA isn’t even bound by Title IX! The NCAA is actively arguing in court that Title IX doesn’t apply to them because they’re a “private entity.” So on one hand, they’re claiming they’re “forced” to allow men to compete against women, but on the other hand, they’re telling the courts Title IX doesn’t even apply to them. Which is it, Charlie?
“Progress”? Don’t Make Me Laugh
Baker’s last-ditch defense was to say that the NCAA has made “progress” on other issues, like the NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) policy and the transfer portal. Oh, how noble. You’ve “made progress” on things that bring you money, but when it comes to protecting women’s sports, you’re somehow paralyzed by “the courts”?
Let’s be clear—nobody is buying this nonsense. The NCAA is cashing in on “equity” while sacrificing fairness on the altar of woke ideology. Meanwhile, women’s teams are being forced to forfeit games because biological men are taking their spots on the court. Five volleyball teams were forced to forfeit seven games because the NCAA decided that “equity” matters more than fairness.
How is that “promoting fairness” in collegiate sports? Spoiler alert: It’s not.
Charlie’s “Weasel Words”
If you’re wondering what Baker’s actual argument is, good luck. His “answers” to Kennedy’s questions were so nonsensical, you’d think he’s running for Congress. His go-to line was that “clarity on this issue would be very helpful.” Translation? Please don’t make me take a stand.
Baker’s logic goes like this:
- Federal judges say trans athletes can compete.
- NCAA follows federal rules.
- Therefore, it’s out of our hands.
Except it’s not. Nothing is stopping Baker from saying, “Enough is enough.” The NCAA could make a rule tomorrow banning biological males from competing in women’s sports, and if someone sued, they’d be on the right side of public opinion, fairness, and science. But instead, Baker is content to “suck on his teeth” (Kennedy’s words) and collect a fat paycheck.
It’s Not About Equality—It’s About Control
Here’s the dirty little secret: This isn’t about “inclusion” or “equality” at all. It’s about control. The woke mob knows that they can bend spineless leaders like Baker to their will. He’s afraid of lawsuits, afraid of activists, and afraid of being “canceled.” So instead of doing his job, he’s caving to a small, vocal minority while telling everyone else to “deal with it.”
Meanwhile, young women—actual women—are losing opportunities. They’re being told to “make accommodations” and “find alternative facilities” when biological males enter their locker rooms. What happened to women’s rights, Title IX, and “safe spaces”?
Final Thoughts
At the end of the day, Charlie Baker’s failure is part of a much bigger problem. It’s not just about sports. It’s about cowardice. It’s about people in power choosing the path of least resistance because they’re too afraid to confront the mob.
The NCAA’s mission is supposed to be about promoting fairness. But under Charlie Baker’s watch, fairness has been thrown out the window. Instead of protecting women’s sports, the NCAA is now a rubber stamp for woke activism.
It’s time for real leadership. It’s time for someone at the NCAA to stand up and say, “No more. We believe in fairness. We believe in truth. And we’re not afraid to defend it.”
But if we’re waiting for Charlie Baker to do that, we’ll be waiting a long time.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal