google.com, pub-8700276199953580, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Trump’s $350M Ordeal: A Sham Ruling Rooted in Political Vendetta

In a recent series of rulings that have sent shockwaves through the political and business realms, former President Donald Trump and his real estate empire have been hit with staggering fines totaling over $350 million across different jurisdictions. These fines, accompanied by a series of bans on conducting business in New York, mark a significant chapter in what appears to be a relentless pursuit by New York Attorney General Letitia James to target Trump. From the onset of her campaign, James made no secret of her intention to “get Trump,” a promise she seems keen on keeping, regardless of the questionable legal grounds or the implications of such a politically charged vendetta.

The Fine: A Closer Look

The fines imposed on Trump, range from $354.9 million to $364 million, with additional penalties that could push the total to over $450 million with interest. These figures are not just numbers but represent a concerted effort to dismantle the Trump Organization, an entity that has been at the forefront of American real estate for decades. The rulings also include bans on Trump and his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, from serving as officers in any New York corporation or legal entity for up to three years, effectively sidelining them from their own business empire in the state.

The Political Undertones

The legal battle against Trump is steeped in political undertones, with Attorney General Letitia James leading the charge. James, who has publicly vowed to target Trump since her campaign days, seems to have found her weapon of choice in the legal system, using it to wage a war against a political adversary. This raises significant questions about the impartiality of the justice system and whether it’s being weaponized for political gain. The narrative being pushed through these legal actions suggests a “sham” more than a quest for justice, as Trump and his legal team have pointed out.

The Evidence and the Allegations

At the heart of the trial are allegations that Trump inflated asset values to secure loans and make deals, a practice not uncommon in the real estate industry and one that is typically subject to negotiation and due diligence by the lending institutions themselves. However, the judge’s ruling, as highlighted in the reports, paints a picture of a one-sided trial, with a notable lack of contrition from the Trump family being cited as evidence of guilt. This aspect of the ruling seems to ignore the complexity of real estate valuations and the role of lenders in verifying the information they base their decisions on.

The Response from Trump

Trump’s response to the rulings has been one of defiance, with the former president taking to social media to decry the decisions as a “complete and total sham” and a continuation of the witch hunt against him. His legal team, led by attorney Alina Habba, has echoed these sentiments, describing the verdict as a “manifest injustice” and a result of a “multi-year, politically fueled witch hunt.” Trump’s intention to appeal the decision is clear, but the road ahead is fraught with challenges, not least of which is the potential financial strain on his empire.

The Implications

The implications of these rulings extend far beyond the financial penalties imposed on Trump and his organization. They represent a dangerous precedent where legal systems can be used as tools for political retribution, undermining the very foundations of justice and fairness. The fact that these rulings come amidst Trump’s campaign to return to the White House adds another layer of complexity to the saga, raising questions about the timing and motivation behind these legal actions.

Final Thoughts

The saga of Trump’s legal battles in New York is a testament to the politicization of the justice system, where Attorney General Letitia James’s campaign promise to “get Trump” seems to have come to fruition. However, the manner in which this promise is being fulfilled raises serious concerns about the integrity of the legal process and the dangerous precedent it sets for political vendettas masquerading as justice. As Trump gears up for his appeal, the outcome of this legal battle will not only determine the future of the Trump Organization but also the very nature of justice in America. Whether this ruling will stand the test of time or be exposed as the sham Trump claims it to be remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the fight is far from over, and the stakes have never been higher.

More Reading

Post navigation

  • This ruling is a fiasco. To have a crime, you must have a victim. There is no victim here.
    It was one said “If that is the law, the law is an ass”. Here we have a corrupt DA supported by a corrupt judge, both proving the law is an ass. They have used their ignorance of Real Estate and Banking practice to create a crime where none exists. Their combined stupidity is obvious, as is their Political intent. Curious that they were unable to produce ONE victim!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I don’t know much about business’s etc however get the H**L out of NEW YORK find a state that would be happy to have them there, How dare this incompetent Judge ban his son’s Don Jr & Eric [God Bless them] from doing any business in the state, Horrible what they being aloud to do this man Donald J Trump God bless him.

  • I have been an appraiser for 48 years. All lenders make their own appraisals on property, then evaluate to risk and apply rates. as they seem fit. I doesn’t matter what the property owner says the property is worth. Bank do what they want to do. This is a sham.

  • Doesn’t every
    American ..! ..over value their property be it a car or a house in order to get as much money as possible..?..and now that is against the law…? And under rate said property in order to pay very little taxes…? ..and this so-called judge and incompetent DA..guilty of the very same thing..I am positive…where is our federal KGB or FBI ..? ..oh..they are busy raiding republican houses…can’t be bothered with upholding the law..what a dam joke our government has become

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *