Justice Kavanaugh Sets Deadline for Michigan Secretary of State in Citizenship Voting Dispute

Kavanaugh Steps Into A Michigan Ballot Fight

Justice Brett Kavanaugh has asked Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to answer in the fight over a proposed Michigan citizenship voting amendment, according to the source report. The petition effort, known as Americans for Citizens Only Voting, seeks to put a citizenship requirement before voters. The campaign turned in 709,841 signatures, which the report says was 59.1% above the 446,198-signature threshold needed to make the ballot. That is not exactly a handful of names scribbled on a napkin at a diner. Yet the proposal is now hanging by a thread after state election staff said it came up 17 signatures short following a review process that has drawn sharp criticism from supporters.

The Timeline Raises Serious Questions

The petition boxes were delivered on March 4, 2026, more than four months before the July 6 filing deadline and months ahead of Election Day. According to the report, the Bureau of Elections did not release its 1,000-signature sample until July 24, then issued a staff report on August 17 saying the petition was 17 signatures short. That was 166 days after the petitions were delivered. By then, the campaign had very little time to challenge rejected signatures, gather affidavits, and appear before the Board of State Canvassers on August 24. The campaign then asked the Michigan Supreme Court to act, and when that did not happen quickly enough, it went to Justice Kavanaugh on August 31 seeking an order by September 3 because the Board of State Canvassers was set to meet September 4 to finalize the ballot.

Signature Matching Becomes The Flashpoint

The central fight appears to be over signatures that Bureau of Elections staff rejected because they allegedly did not match signatures on file. Many people at the Lansing meeting reportedly objected, noting that signatures can change over time. That is common sense, which is sometimes treated in government offices like a suspicious foreign substance. The report also points to a past controversy involving Benson’s guidance to clerks on absentee ballots, saying she previously told clerks to assume signatures matched when accepting absentee ballots. Now, in this ballot petition fight, signature matching has become the very tool being used to keep the citizenship voting proposal in danger of missing the ballot.

Affidavits Put The Board Under The Microscope

Attorneys working with the petition campaign reportedly obtained 23 affidavits from people in the 1,000-signature sample whose signatures had been rejected by state staff. The report says 19 affidavits were provided by the 10 a.m. Saturday deadline, with four more delivered later Saturday, though the exact time was unclear. One video highlighted by the source shows a disputed affidavit being rejected because it arrived after the 10 a.m. procedural deadline. The striking part is that the board members and Bureau of Elections Director Jonathan Brater reportedly agreed the signature matched, yet the affidavit was not accepted because of the deadline issue. If that is accurate, it raises the obvious question voters are already asking: if the signature matched, why was it rejected in the first place?

Videos From The Canvassers Meeting

The source report included several posts from the Board of Canvassers fight, showing the heated dispute over the petition, the affidavits, and the state’s handling of the signatures. These clips are part of why this story is getting attention beyond Lansing. When citizens bring hundreds of thousands of signatures and then watch the process come down to a narrow technical fight, people tend to notice. Funny how that works when voters want a say in their own elections.

Citizenship Voting Question Heads Toward A Deadline

The larger issue is simple: Michigan voters deserve a clean answer on whether this citizenship voting amendment can appear on the ballot. The campaign says it submitted far more signatures than required. State staff says the petition is short by 17. Supporters say the state delayed too long, scrutinized signatures too harshly, and left the campaign scrambling against ballot deadlines. With Justice Kavanaugh now requiring a response from Benson, the dispute has moved from a state boardroom into a far bigger spotlight. For a proposal dealing with who gets to vote in American elections, that spotlight is exactly where it belongs.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.

JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *