Joe Biden recently commented on the news of his son Hunter’s guilty verdict, saying, “As I said last week, I am the President, but I am also a Dad. Jill and I love our son, and we are so proud of the man he is today.” This statement comes after Hunter Biden, 54, was convicted on three felonies related to lying on a gun application.
Despite the charges against his son, Biden remains proud of him and will continue to support him no matter what but is it that or—Is Biden using Hunter’s drug addiction as a scapegoat to the Biden crime family issues?
Many are taking issue with Biden’s unwavering support for his son. Top conservatives are warning against falling for the narrative that Hunter’s addiction played a role in his illegal actions. One such commentator said, “But he [Hunter] plainly figured he might get off… that at least one juror in Biden-loving Delaware would be intimidated by the power appearance of first lady Jill Biden and the rest of the clan in the courtroom.”
This sentiment is supported by the fact that Hunter pleaded not guilty to the charges, showing a sense of entitled arrogance. His decision to plead not guilty was likely influenced by the support of his powerful and influential family, including his father, the President of the United States. This power dynamic was evident in the courtroom, where the judge did not allow cameras, but reporters noted the presence of the first lady, showing the family’s attempt to sway the outcome in Hunter’s favor.
However, the special counsel in this case, David Weiss, made it clear that this case was not about addiction. He said, “Ultimately this case was not just about addiction… This case was about the illegal choices the defendant made while in the throes of addiction.” This statement debunks the narrative that Hunter’s addiction played a role in his actions and highlights the seriousness of his crimes.
Despite the evidence and the prosecutor’s arguments, the Bidens remain firm in their stance and will not give up on Hunter. The President’s statement shows a father’s unconditional love for his son, but it also raises concerns about the extent of his support. By stating that he will accept the outcome of this case and respect the judicial process, Biden is implying that he may have considered pardoning his son had he been convicted.
.@POTUS statement on verdict in Hunter Biden’s trial. pic.twitter.com/oBT9yoLhaf
— Jeff Mason (@jeffmason1) June 11, 2024
Furthermore, the President’s statement is concerning because it reveals how the powerful and influential can potentially sway the judicial process. The New York Post’s editorial states, “He plainly figured he might get off… Nor will this be the end of his chutzpah: Once sentenced… he’ll likely appeal – probably by arguing that this law, passed with help from then-Sen. Joe Biden, violates the Second Amendment.” This editorial raises questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the fairness of Hunter’s trial.
Statements from Hunter Biden and his defense attorney. pic.twitter.com/OMPEUbCM47
— CSPAN (@cspan) June 11, 2024
The focus on Hunter’s addiction also detracts from the seriousness of his illegal actions and sends a message that his wealth and status make him above the law. As the case moves onto the sentencing phase, there is no doubt that Hunter’s powerful family will continue to use their influence to protect him. It is a concerning display of misplaced priorities and a stark reminder of the unequal treatment of the law for the rich and powerful.